Here are a couple of articles that appeared today in the national press and containing statements that the Secretary General of the CGIL Susanna Camusso made on all'accordo separato (senza la firma della FIOM) su FIAT Mirafiori:
.
Il segretario generale parla di ritorno agli anni Cinquanta con l´esclusione della Fiom dalla fabbrica La leader Cgil: Cisl e Uil sono ormai sindacati aziendalisti
| 27/12/2010 We would never have signed an agreement agreeing to exclude a union from | |||||||||||||||
| O makes its authority in enterprise system will prevail or the rules of the jungle | |||||||||||||||
| A union does not may be confined to the opposition, otherwise waiving the protection of workers real | |||||||||||||||
| ROME - "Sergio Marchionne? An anti-democratic, illiberal and authoritarian, "he says Susanna Camusso, general secretary of the CGIL union, which for the first time to speak to the separate Chrysler reached on the eve Christmas. Cartel - say - the CGIL had never signed because "we can not agree on the exclusion of a union." Camusso attacks CISL and UIL, " were transformed into unions that propagate the position of the Fiat . Then the Confindustria: "O makes its authority in enterprise system will prevail or the rules of the jungle. Can not simply look for an offensive is underway against him as well. " But there are also errors of Fiom, says the leader of the CGIL union: "We will discuss our own house." No strike in sight (apart from that of the Fiom) but a great campaign on the issue of freedom of association. And the Democratic Party? "Well Bersani - Camusso answers - but too often the left there is a tedious debate on innovation without realizing that it may also represent a deep recession. " What does the exclusion from the Fiom Mirafiori factory symbol in the Italian industry? So why not apply the agreement interconfederal of '93 the Freedom of Association? I would also like to remind " means a return to the Fifties . Then there were the department confinement, today is the exclusion of union representation. The idea, however, is exactly the same. And that is to build a business but not union corporatists whose sole purpose is to propagate the views of the company. " Is not that a bit 'offensive CISL and UIL? "Look, in his book" The time of sowing, "Bonanni says with pride how, in his fifties, refused the request of the CISL Fiat cisline to enter the lists for the election of some council thanked the company names . You Bonanni that illustrates how the company union is the negation of the Confederation. Now he should explain how to consider an agreement that contains within it the rules to exclude another trade union confederation. " You are anticipating a system of industrial relations without the CGIL? "I think Fiat has deliberately constructed a sequence of events to deny freedom of association." Marchionne has always said that the thesis of this kind are neither in heaven nor on earth. " Confindustria that can not stand still if he wants to avoid jumping, as recognized by the system of union representation. If you do not want to risk that social conflict must become unmanageable as soon as possible to agree on union representation and democracy to complement the Protocol of '93. " It is open to the Confederation of the negotiation? "It does not matter who does it. I believe that CISL and UIL have underestimated l´effetto dell´intesa per Mirafiori. Perché quando si permette a una grande impresa di escludere un sindacato, si sa con chi si comincia ma non si sa con chi si finisce». Considera Marchionne un innovatore o, come si diceva un tempo, un reazionario? «Penso che il tratto distintivo di quell´accordo sia il suo essere anti-democratico. Direi che Marchionne è un anti-democratico e illiberale. Il tema vero è questo. Aggiungo che non può esserci un modello partecipativo che si fondi sull´impedimento della libertà sindacale». Ma la Fiom non poteva firmare "turandosi il naso", rimanendo però all´interno della fabbrica? «È difficile applicare il principio tured with the nose of the vote in union negotiations. Fiom, possibly with the CGIL, will open a discussion about this defeat. Why, I have already said, a union can not simply surrender to the opposition otherwise the concrete protection of workers. is criticizing the Fiom. The blame, then, are at home? "When there's not a defeat may not have been committed errors. No great defeat is only daughter of the counterparty. Taught us of victory: even if there is a liability in the minimum percentage on that can be questioned. " Because no agreement to share the Mirafiori? «Perché quella proposta è poco rispettosa della fatica del lavoro. Non si può applicare ai lavoratori la cosiddetta "clausola di responsabilità", secondo la quale non è possibile opporsi all´intesa e scioperare anche se le condizioni di lavoro diventano insopportabili. Una clausola di quel tipo possono sceglierla sindacati e imprese ma non possono subirla i lavoratori». Dunque, questo è il motivo del no? «Questo è il motivo . Comunque la Cgil non firmerebbe mai un accordo che escludesse un altro sindacato». Ammetterà almeno che Cisl e Uil hanno reso possibile l´investimento della Fiat e così il futuro produttivo di Mirafiori? «Capisco questo reasoning and consider it an important issue. However, I would like to know what is the project "Factory of Italy" and think like Fiat to bridge the gap that has accumulated over its competitors on the side of the models. But I still do not understand why there was such need to resort to an authoritarian model that brings us back to the Fifties. " ROBERTO MANIA . | |||||||||||||||
| 27/12/2010 In recent days, and to extend the agreement quickly interconfederal '93 to resolve the node representation that opens the way for a law " . Confindustria has really positive definite agreement on Mirafiori. "I'm the recent statements in which Confindustria made it clear that challenging the system of representation would lead to an unnecessary level of conflict . Confindustria ask to be consistent and to describe us urgently with the rules of representation. Here are denied freedom of association, one of the cornerstones of any democratic system. There is the idea that the company can exert its function only if all employees think like her. "
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment